Hope Feels Embarrassing Right Now

A Blunt Meditation on the Awkwardness of Staying Optimistic in a Collapsing World

Dmitry Kharitonov

Lately, hope has become culturally awkward, even suspect. It no longer aligns with the dominant aesthetics of irony, detachment, and doom-scrolling. To express sincere optimism in an era characterized by systemic breakdown, environmental crisis, and institutional failure is to risk being labeled naive or worse, ignorant. Hope, once valorized, now occupies an uneasy space between delusion and denial. It has become not just unfashionable, but even potentially transgressive in circles where intelligence is equated with critique and where emotional vulnerability is treated as immaturity.

Our collective affect leans toward exhaustion and skepticism. Disillusionment is a shared language. Social capital accrues not through inspiration but through critique. If one isn’t deeply cynical about late capitalism, climate inertia, or the bureaucratization of everyday life, one risks social exclusion. In such a context, to articulate belief in transformation or collective betterment feels performatively out of place. The performative detachment has calcified into a social norm, a mask we wear to survive the daily absurdities of living within collapsing systems.

And yet, I still want to believe. Not in utopias or false promises but in small ruptures, in honest repair, in the possibility of shifting course. I resent that this impulse feels embarrassing. I resent that emotional sincerity has become a punchline. Because that impulse, however quiet, is often what keeps people going. And denying it can mean cutting ourselves off from the very fuel that might lead to action, change, or even communal resilience.

The Aesthetics of Hopelessness

Hope has become uncool. The posturing of emotional aloofness, laced with meme irony and political detachment, dominates digital discourse. We have experienced too much betrayal from public institutions, from private lives, from the myth of meritocracy, to easily return to unguarded belief. Disappointment has shaped a generation’s emotional vocabulary. It’s no longer about just fearing loss, it’s about anticipating it, bracing for it, scripting your reactions before anything even happens.

So we mask our yearning for something better. We self-deprecate. We aestheticize numbness. We rehearse detachment as a way to feel in control. This collective distancing insulates us from vulnerability but also isolates us from meaning. It estranges us from the very emotional mechanisms that allow collective agency to exist. Underneath that irony and apathy is usually someone who once cared deeply and got nothing in return.

Hope is often mistaken for ignorance, but informed hope is something else entirely. It doesn’t deny the darkness—it persists in spite of it. And this persistence demands courage, not delusion. Because choosing to hope necessitates choosing to risk. And risk, especially after repeated loss, feels unbearable. Still, the alternative—total disengagement—may be even more corrosive. To abandon hope entirely is to abandon any sense of moral or existential direction.

Hope as Resistance in a Collapsing World

The world is collapsing in ways both visible and subterranean. Environmental degradation, political extremism, and mass disillusionment create an ambient dread that is hard to dislodge. In this atmosphere, hope can feel not only implausible but irresponsible. How can you talk about better futures when people are just trying to survive?

And yet, there is a profound philosophical distinction between naïve optimism and strategic hope. Hope, when understood as praxis, becomes a refusal to let despair be our only lens. It becomes an act of resistance against cynicism’s seduction. Not an uncritical positivity, but a commitment to keep imagining—even amid ruin. Hope, then, is not the absence of despair but its counterbalance. It asks us to remain emotionally available to the idea of transformation.

Hope does not need to be loud. It can be small, quiet, barely perceptible. It can be embedded in humor, in protest, in the creation of art that gestures toward new futures. It is the silent insistence that another way is possible, even when proof is scarce. And even that insistence—soft as it may seem—is disruptive. It interrupts narratives of inevitability and invites us to re-engage with moral agency in a time that disincentivizes it.

Caring as a Radical Act

To care in the current climate is to go against the grain. Numbness is often adaptive; it helps us survive the overwhelming cascade of global crisis and intimate despair. But numbness, when prolonged, dulls not only pain—but purpose. Over time, it breeds isolation, detachment, and a subtle form of despair that becomes hard to name.

Choosing to care is arduous. It requires effort. It makes demands on our time, our hearts, our attention spans. But it is also what keeps us tethered to something larger than ourselves. It resists the flattening effect of despair and reconnects us with collective potential. It invites us to be porous again, vulnerable again—even when the world has taught us that safety lies in disengagement.

Hope, then, becomes a discipline rather than an emotion. A daily exercise in showing up for

people, for values, for visions not yet realized. A belief not in guaranteed outcomes, but in the dignity of the attempt. A political and emotional ethic that says: I will not disengage. I will not numb myself into passivity, even if it’s easier. Caring becomes a stance of resistance against entropy.

Reclaiming the “Cringe” of Hope

Hope will not win you prestige. It lacks the critical edge that dominates academic and cultural analysis. But perhaps that’s what makes it urgent. In a world that rewards detachment, being emotionally earnest can feel like exposure. But maybe that exposure is the point. Maybe sincerity—especially when inconvenient—is how transformation sneaks in.

Letting yourself hope—publicly, imperfectly—is a form of resistance. It disrupts the cool neutrality that cynicism demands. It says: I care enough to be disappointed. I believe enough to risk being wrong. That kind of hope doesn’t sanitize pain; it dignifies struggle. It acknowledges the difficulty of living in this world and still choosing to participate.

The future remains uncertain, maybe even bleak. But in that uncertainty is the chance for emergence. And hope—clumsy, quiet, uncool—is how we find the will to meet it. It’s not heroic. It’s not glamorous. But it might be all we have left when irony has burned itself out and the next wave of crisis arrives. We don’t need hope to feel good—we need it to keep going.

---

Resources:

• AI powered write up demand on the org that pays my bills